編輯“WordPress:WPMU Commonly Edited Core Files”

Matt said [http://photomatt.net/2005/05/19/subversioning-wordpress-upgrades/#comment-20668 "... I strongly recommend never touching core files"].

Matt說(shuō)[http://photomatt.net/2005/05/19/subversioning-wordpress-upgrades/#comment-20668 "... 我強(qiáng)烈建議你永遠(yuǎn)不要處理核心文件"]。

Although the separation between admin-added and WPMU-distributed files is meant to be total, for various reasons the community does have some files that it finds reason to change. 
 
雖然管理員添加的和WPMU發(fā)行的文件之間的區(qū)分是完全的，但是因?yàn)椴煌脑颍瑘F(tuán)隊(duì)的確有一些需要更改的文件。
 
Many would favour a clean distinction between the core files of WPMU and those that they add or customise. 

許多人希望WPMU核心文件和自己添加或者自定義的文件之間能夠清楚地分開(kāi)。

For example, needing to change a core file to change the default blog links is awkward for the administrator trying to keep up to date with the core distribution, and causes noise in the blog. Some 

例如，需要更改核心文件，以更改默認(rèn)博客鏈接，試著跟上核心發(fā)行的文件的管理員，很難處理，導(dǎo)致博客中出現(xiàn)噪音。一些

Many of these have tickets in trac so that they can be configuration items.

許多在trac中有tickets因此可以是配置內(nèi)容。

==wp-admin/index.php for default feeds in the dashboard==

==dashboard中的默認(rèn)feeds的wp-admin/index.php ==

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1910&replies=5

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1584&replies=6



http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1910&replies=5

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1584&replies=6

== for allowing only registered users to comment ==

== 只允許已注冊(cè)的用戶(hù)發(fā)表評(píng)論==

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1533&replies=7#post-8544

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1533&replies=7#post-8544

== Changing the Hello World Posts ==
== 更改 Hello World 文章 ==

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=965&page=3&replies=66#post-10470
http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1812&replies=12#post-10607


http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=965&page=3&replies=66#post-10470
http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1812&replies=12#post-10607


Short answer: changing this is "beyond the scope of wpmu" as "wpmu follows wp" and there is apparently no need to change it in WP. (Presumbably because in WP the administrator is also the installer, and a generic message fits all.).

簡(jiǎn)要回答：更改這個(gè)文章"超過(guò)了wpmu的范圍"因?yàn)?wpmu 跟隨wp"而且很顯然在WP中不需要更改這篇文章。（因?yàn)樵赪P中管理員也是安裝人員，同一類(lèi)的信息適合所有內(nèi)容。）

Of course, there's also the problem that people try to workaround these posts in other plugins, such as http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=965&page=2&replies=66#post-10065 - and this creates code bloat.

當(dāng)然，人們?cè)谄渌寮刑幚磉@些文章的時(shí)候，也會(huì)遇到問(wèn)題，例如http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=965&page=2&replies=66#post-10065 – 導(dǎo)致了代碼冗余。

== Preventing comments being interpreted as updates to the blog ==

==阻止博客更新的時(shí)候，評(píng)論被解釋==

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1982&replies=7 

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1982&replies=7 

== Is it possible that when a new blog is registered successfully, that the membership setting (Users must be registered and logged in to comment) could default to checked vs unchecked? ==


== 新博客成功地注冊(cè)的時(shí)候，成員資格設(shè)置（用戶(hù)必須注冊(cè)并且登錄到評(píng)論）是默認(rèn)檢查還是不檢查? ==


http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1933&replies=3

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1933&replies=3