WordPress:WPMU Commonly Edited Core Files

Matt said .

Matt說。

Although the separation between admin-added and WPMU-distributed files is meant to be total, for various reasons the community does have some files that it finds reason to change.

雖然管理員添加的和WPMU發(fā)行的文件之間的區(qū)分是完全的，但是因為不同的原因，團(tuán)隊的確有一些需要更改的文件。

Many would favour a clean distinction between the core files of WPMU and those that they add or customise.

許多人希望WPMU核心文件和自己添加或者自定義的文件之間能夠清楚地分開。

For example, needing to change a core file to change the default blog links is awkward for the administrator trying to keep up to date with the core distribution, and causes noise in the blog. Some

例如，需要更改核心文件，以更改默認(rèn)博客鏈接，試著跟上核心發(fā)行的文件的管理員，很難處理，導(dǎo)致博客中出現(xiàn)噪音。一些

Many of these have tickets in trac so that they can be configuration items.

許多在trac中有tickets因此可以是配置內(nèi)容。

目錄

• 1 wp-admin/index.php for default feeds in the dashboard
• 2 dashboard中的默認(rèn)feeds的wp-admin/index.php
• 3 for allowing only registered users to comment
• 4 只允許已注冊的用戶發(fā)表評論
• 5 Changing the Hello World Posts
• 6 更改 Hello World 文章
• 7 Preventing comments being interpreted as updates to the blog
• 8 阻止博客更新的時候，評論被解釋
• 9 Is it possible that when a new blog is registered successfully, that the membership setting (Users must be registered and logged in to comment) could default to checked vs unchecked?
• 10 新博客成功地注冊的時候，成員資格設(shè)置（用戶必須注冊并且登錄到評論）是默認(rèn)檢查還是不檢查?

dashboard中的默認(rèn)feeds的wp-admin/index.php

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1910&replies=5

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1584&replies=6

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1910&replies=5

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1584&replies=6

只允許已注冊的用戶發(fā)表評論

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1533&replies=7#post-8544

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1533&replies=7#post-8544

更改 Hello World 文章

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=965&page=3&replies=66#post-10470 http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1812&replies=12#post-10607

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=965&page=3&replies=66#post-10470 http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1812&replies=12#post-10607

Short answer: changing this is "beyond the scope of wpmu" as "wpmu follows wp" and there is apparently no need to change it in WP. (Presumbably because in WP the administrator is also the installer, and a generic message fits all.).

簡要回答：更改這個文章"超過了wpmu的范圍"因為"wpmu 跟隨wp"而且很顯然在WP中不需要更改這篇文章。（因為在WP中管理員也是安裝人員，同一類的信息適合所有內(nèi)容。）

Of course, there's also the problem that people try to workaround these posts in other plugins, such as http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=965&page=2&replies=66#post-10065 - and this creates code bloat.

當(dāng)然，人們在其它插件中處理這些文章的時候，也會遇到問題，例如http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=965&page=2&replies=66#post-10065 – 導(dǎo)致了代碼冗余。

阻止博客更新的時候，評論被解釋

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1982&replies=7

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1982&replies=7

新博客成功地注冊的時候，成員資格設(shè)置（用戶必須注冊并且登錄到評論）是默認(rèn)檢查還是不檢查?

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1933&replies=3

http://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic.php?id=1933&replies=3